Thursday, 25 June 2009 12:43
Blair
 I have been getting more and more into Linux particularly since installing Eeebuntu. What really made it garner my enthusiasm was that a lot of the hassle had been taken out of setting up my EeePC901. As a windows user, I am pretty much used to hardware working straight out of the box. Driver sup…
Discuss (11 posts)
|
Re:Got a new wireless N router and Linux won't play nice
Jun 26 2009 11:42:46
I'm sorry the wireless isn't working perfectly for you currently (although most of your sadness comes from a desire to set your device to n only, when you'd likely be fine temporarily with G).
What is the model number? I was hoping someone else with more networking experience would comment, but since they haven't, I'll see what I can dig up.
Props on setting up your own server. Let us know if you have any questions there.
Cryo
|
#124 |
|
Re:Got a new wireless N router and Linux won't play nice
Jun 27 2009 00:27:50
Wow, you did really well, compiling can be a painful experience, I try to avoid it if I can.
That really demonstrates the Catch 22 with hardware drivers (and Linux gaming)... if there was full driver support (and Linux versions of major games) we would get more Linux users... because there are relatively few Linux users there is patchy driver support and very few games companies make versions for Linux...
All the best,
Shalva.
Oh, by the way, why not try Open DNS? It's supposed to be faster than most ISP servers, I use it, I find it pretty good, it's got other security advantages too:
www.opendns.com/start/computer/
.
|
#126 |
|
Re:Got a new wireless N router and Linux won't play nice
Jun 27 2009 16:49:23
Yes the catch 22 I think doesnt just extend to games.
Tried open DNS, can't see much difference speed wise, but I will keep it on for a bit and se how it works out over time
|
#127 |
|
Re:Got a new wireless N router and Linux won't play nice
Jul 07 2009 11:51:51
Sorry to hear about your driver issues. Linux has come a long way with wireless drivers, though. That's especially impressive, given that most wireless manufacturers only provide Windows drivers, and those only seem to work *some* of the time!
Linux has done a lot of "swimming against the current" to get to the current state of affairs. Thankfully, some of the wireless hardware (chip) manufacturers have begun to offer drivers for Linux, and documentation (usually held NDA-confidential) to the Linux developers. Ralink and Atheros chipsets seem to be particularly well supported.
linuxwireless.org/ is worth checking before you purchase new networking hardware.
|
#133 |
|
Re:Got a new wireless N router and Linux won't play nice
Jul 10 2009 17:57:34
Ok, so we are two weeks out with no posts, and I think the month long trial is at an end.
Any updates? Everything ok? We've seen lots of posts of minor irritations, but not much that said anyone was happy with the transition, or what the future plans were with using linux.
Personally, I just hope you're not stuck trying to re-install windows on the netbook... that can be hairy sometimes.
|
#134 |
|
Re:Got a new wireless N router and Linux won't play nice
Jul 10 2009 21:41:43
Yeh, point taken and apologies.
I think that I have become absolutely transfixed by linux. I underestimated just how long it would take me to cover the ground that I want to, and have also become quite wrapped up in getting the software to work.
I will write up a more detailed report tomorrow, but the early news is that I am extending the trial.
I am loving the experiance, but what I would say is that it is quite a difficult transition to make.
|
#135 |
|
Re:Got a new wireless N router and Linux won't play nice
Jul 11 2009 00:36:07
I don't think it's really possible to give Linux a fair try *without* getting hooked.
And the barriers to being a power user are so low, and the rewards are so high, pretty much everyone makes it there eventually. Unlike Windows and Mac OS, there's documentation explaining how to recompile the kernel, get rid of unused services, tweak things, and in general mess with the deepest depths "under the hood." The whole thing is intended to be infinitely customizable. Instead of convincing you that such tweaks are unneeded, they make the tweaking process really, really simple.
Look at me-- after just two years of Linux use, I was able to boot into a completely smashed Linux installation and rebuild it from the inside out. (Replacement SysV init in five lines of BASH, anyone?) For that matter, look at you-- barely a month into your Linux use, you've compiled a kernel module from source after changing the makefile to suite your needs, and it worked on the first try. I'm willing to bet you wouldn't have even known what that means a month ago.
Stick with it, and you pick up these sort of abilities without even realizing you're doing it. Before you know it, you're impressing your friends and confounding your enemies with jargon, customizing your setup to suit your own needs, installing Linux on dead badgers-- and having a wonderful time.
Good luck Blair, you're in for some great fun!
|
#136 |
|
Re:Got a new wireless N router and Linux won't play nice
Jul 11 2009 01:20:47
Ok, I am livid with this forum software now. I viewed as a guest, logged in but forgot to reload the window, then spent 10 mins writing a response. Since I thought I was logged in, I didn;t even notice the input string, and click I clicked submit, it lost my entire post because the string was incorrect. Noting could recover it. THAT is not a good design.
I'll be back later with my response, but it won't be as well written as my old one, and that just upsets me, as the forum should let you enter the code if you made a mistake.
|
#137 |
|
Re:Got a new wireless N router and Linux won't play nice
Jul 11 2009 02:37:05
I've taken to writing my posts in gedit, then copying them in, for that exact reason.
|
#138 |
|
Re:Got a new wireless N router and Linux won't play nice
Jul 11 2009 03:40:30
Ok, so here is my not so well written and descriptive attempt to remember my points:
Blair, in no way was that trying to chastise you. I give you a TON of credit for even being willing to take the plunge. Humans don't like change and do not go out of their comfort zone easily. The fact that you were willing to take such a huge and all in plunge is extremely impressive, and please do not think we are not anything but completely supportive and willing to help. You've done a great job, and I hope you've had some fun. Like I said earlier, a lot of the more recent posts deal with problems, but I hope you are enjoying the experience.
Blair wrote:
I am loving the experiance, but what I would say is that it is quite a difficult transition to make.
I agree and disagree with this statement. Here's a quick review:
1. Awe and wonder at the ease of install, and some of the apparent nice features of linux.
2. Problems with finding an appropriate piece of software that does everything you want it to. I use Autocad at work. Trust me, I understand this. Some windows programs have some advantages, some linux programs have some advantages, and macs are there too. Every system has certain traits that put the others to shame. The majority of the time, I find that overall Linux feels easier and more full featured, but there are occasionally things I'd love to be able to do.
3. Run into problems with hardware (that are rather device specific, but we have all had problems with some stupid hardware). You took an interesting path by switching distros, which turned out to be the best possible option for you. You also got another chance to try a fresh install, and see how it can vary across distros.
4. Built your own server. Back to wonderment here. I assume there have been no major issues there? Easy to do, should be just sitting in a corner with no one thinking about it... since it will likely not crash without some hardware fault. So easy to forget about it though, but it is invaluable.
5. Back to problems again, although this one was a little self imposed. Instead of settling for G, you decided you needed cutting edge N. Wireless drivers are known for problems (this includes windows, lets be honest). Part of me thinks you may have wanted the challenge though. Either way, you jumped leaps and bounds in your skill set, and actually built your own software with a little help. VERY cool.
Now the 2ns to last sentence has an important key... with a little help. Have you ever noticed that on windows forums people are usually a lot more pissed off and generally agitated? Whiel some of that appears on linux forums, I find that it is more often than not a lot of people coming together to solve a problem (or scratch an itch in programming terms). The whole community just feels... nicer and more inviting. The power of that should not be overlooked.
In the end, you've done an incredible job. I applaud you for taking this risk full on, and for being willing to extend your learning and the project. No matter what OS you end up going with (I think I am leaning towards you using multiple eventually, but we will see), you will have really opened your eyes. You'll miss things that become second nature on the other os, tools that are available, or just another way to do things. You will see all OSs in a different light, and see the merits of each just a little better. And that is always a good thing. Keep us posted... we just want to make sure you are ok.
Max - good thing you didn't say you were editing with vi or emacs... blair doesn't need a war on his hands.
Follow-up - It happened AGAIN. I logged in, said remember me, but I took Max's advice. By the time I hit submit (and there was NO code listed on the page) it had logged me out and I almost lost it again. Thank goodness for copy/paste.
|
#139 |
Discuss this item on the forums. (11 posts)
Monday, 22 June 2009 22:38
Blair
 When I was younger I was always trying to run long before I could walk properly. Some say that my unusual looks are a side effect of this early over confidence! Well it's fair to say that I have learned nothing from so many knocks to the head, and this weekend proves a pointI decided to set up a s…
Discuss (0 posts) Discuss this item on the forums. (0 posts)
Monday, 22 June 2009 11:24
Daniel Cumming
 I have begun work on the serious part of testing DAW software on Linux. Yesterday I exported each track from a demanding mix into seperate .wav files so that they could be imported into Ardour. It looks something like this: and this, for the curious, is what the mixer looks like: As you can see I h…
Discuss (3 posts)
|
Re:Ardour and Adversity.
Jun 22 2009 13:07:02
Jack is by far the biggest problem with getting the audio parts working together, but from what I gather extremely important since it helps all the programs talk to one another. I played with it a couple of years ago, but but I didn't get too far.
Since it looks like ubuntu studio, try this: How to get jack working with ubuntu studio
or
This: Configure Jack
or
This: Jack Configuration
Or you could try out 64Studio which supposedly does all the jack setup for you.
Let us know if any of that helps.
|
#119 |
|
Re:Ardour and Adversity.
Jun 23 2009 05:22:41
JACK (Jack Audio Connection Kit) is an audio server like Alsa or OSS. The special thing about JACK is that it lets applications communicate with each other, in ways they weren't even designed to do so. In other words, you might create something in the drum machine program Hydrogen, and then Ardour would act as if Hydrogen was just another microphone. You'd play it in Hydrogen, record it in Ardour, do whatever you want with it, then export it to some other editor, or import sound from some other editor... you get the idea. It's also really, really fast, and has practically zero blatancy.
So the plus side of JACK is that it's amazing.
The downside of JACK is that, since it was originally written for Ardour and it never got popular except in the pro audio scene, it's not widely used, so sadly it isn't pre-setup to work out of the box on most Linux distros.
There are a few which do, though, and 64 Studio is one of them. I've never tried any of those though, so I can't really recommend one. I've heard good things about 64 Studio but that's as much as I can say, sorry.
|
#121 |
Discuss this item on the forums. (3 posts)
Thursday, 18 June 2009 21:47
Blair
 Window users like myself can see linux systems as a bit techie, particularly when websites and those in the linux know tend to quote frequently command lin instructions which you might be forgiven for thinking is all there is to linux.I have to say that I use the cmd tool within windows infrequently…
Discuss (10 posts)
|
terminal customization
Jun 19 2009 00:25:36
You can adapt your command line to resemble DOS more closely by using aliases.
alias dir=ls
will allow you to use dir to list directories.
This is for the current shell only, so if you want that behavior to be permanent, put this line in /etc/profile or ~/.bash.bashrc
|
#104 |
|
Re:terminal customization
Jun 19 2009 10:20:02
Top quality tip thankyou!!
That worked a treat Thanks...
I am actually getting used to using ls, but setting that up works as a catch all for those coffee derived moments...
Any other hot command line tips?
|
#107 |
|
Re:Get-Iplayer tempts me to the terminal
Jun 19 2009 11:32:34
Hmm, I keep losing my posts because it doesn't always remember my login, and when the number code isn't entered, it forgets my text. As a quick note, the message text really should be saved on an error there. What forum software is this?
Anyway, to recap what I just lost:
Due to the variety of gui tools (for example wicd, networkmanager, kwlan) forums usually need to go to the underlying low level command line tool (ie. ifconfig, editing /etc/network/interface) to make sure the fixes work for everyone. So it may appear that the only way to fix things is command line, but there is usually a gui tool to fix it.
Shell tips:
About the aliasing mentioned earlier, while helpful in the short term, what happens when you get to a comp without that set up? It is likely just better to suffer now through the retyping to learn it.
If you do screw it up a command with arguments, use !!, or This trick. In general, shell-fu is awesome for time saving tools.
Another great feature is autocomplete. Start typing, hit tab. IT will give you a list of possible matches. If there is only one, it will just fill it out for you (great for navigating to long decompressed directories). This works on directories, files, and commands.
|
#108 |
|
Re:Get-Iplayer tempts me to the terminal
Jun 19 2009 11:57:03
A Cheat Sheet could also be handy.
|
#109 |
|
Re:Get-Iplayer tempts me to the terminal
Jun 19 2009 15:45:24
Oh noes! You've become a hacker.
|
#110 |
|
Re:Get-Iplayer tempts me to the terminal
Jun 19 2009 16:40:16
w00t, 1'm 4 pr0p3r h4ck3r n0w. 
|
#111 |
|
Re:Get-Iplayer tempts me to the terminal
Jun 19 2009 20:28:32
This site is awesome, lots of commands you'll want to remember as a power user 
|
#113 |
|
Re:Get-Iplayer tempts me to the terminal
Jun 21 2009 00:31:56
The combination of history and grep saved me some time.
"history" - prints the last ~500 commands with arguments
"grep" - searches in the given input or in files. Great for finding stuff.
Say, you used wget to download the cheat sheet mentioned by Cryophallion:
wget files.fosswire.com/2007/08/fwunixref.pdf
A while after that, you accidentally deleted it and vaguely remember having used this command, but not the exact spelling. Then,
history | grep fosswire
gives you all past commands containing "fosswire", including the above.
The "|" is called a pipe, it connects the output of a program to the input of another. You can do all kinds of stuff with it.
|
#115 |
|
Re:Get-Iplayer tempts me to the terminal
Jun 21 2009 00:55:04
iguana wrote:
The combination of history and grep saved me some time.
"history" - prints the last ~500 commands with arguments
"grep" - searches in the given input or in files. Great for finding stuff.
Say, you used wget to download the cheat sheet mentioned by Cryophallion:
wget files.fosswire.com/2007/08/fwunixref.pdf
A while after that, you accidentally deleted it and vaguely remember having used this command, but not the exact spelling. Then,
history | grep fosswire
gives you all past commands containing "fosswire", including the above.
The "|" is called a pipe, it connects the output of a program to the input of another. You can do all kinds of stuff with it.
yes, grep is awesome (esp with something like ps aux | grep {program name})
And here is another awesome one along the lines of your tip:
control-r puts you in search mode. Start typing, and it will fill in the last commands you typed. Hit control-r again to step back. Saves a ton of time when trying to redo a common command.
|
#116 |
|
Re:Get-Iplayer tempts me to the terminal
Jun 21 2009 23:15:07
yes grep is indeed useful.
you can find a certain part of large outputs easily, for example
dmesg
gives a load of messages you cannot read all at once, so most is cut off from your sight. If you need to know which serial port your 3G modem has opened (for example), you can do so by typing
dmesg | grep sierra
(sierra is manufacturer name of my modem card)
the sign "|" causes the two commands to be executed dependant on each other, but you can also couple several commands with the sign "&&" as follows:
set-led rgb 255 0 0 && sleep 1 && set-led rgb 0 0 0
(lets your email notifier light up for 1 second)
if you're unsure about syntax of a certain command, you can try evoking it with -h or --help, or you can try using the "man" command if theres a manual saved somewhere:
man dmesg
(shift-Q exits the manual viewer)
once again, w3lc0m3 t0 r34l LiVuX 
|
#117 |
Discuss this item on the forums. (10 posts) |
|